Financial hardship must be considered in stay conditions; failure to do so justifies fresh reconsideration of the deposit requirement.

A stay order imposing a deposit condition must take account of the assessee's pleaded financial incapacity, because recovery requirements have to be balanced against the ability to comply and the risk to business continuity. Here, the Tribunal had noted challenges to jurisdiction and the charging provision, but it did not deal with the specific plea that payment was impossible due to financial hardship. The High Court therefore interfered only to that limited extent, set aside the stay condition for fresh consideration on hardship, and left the remaining aspects undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's order directing deposit of part of the demand as a condition for stay of the assessment order was liable to be set aside for failing to consider the petitioners' contention of financial hardship.

Analysis: The Tribunal had noticed the petitioners' challenge on jurisdiction and on the applicability of the charging provision, and those aspects were treated as requiring deeper consideration at the final hearing. However, the order did not deal with the petitioners' specific plea that payment of the amount directed for stay was impossible on account of financial difficulty. A stay order must balance the Revenue's interest in recovery with the assessee's ability to comply, and an inability to pay because of financial distress cannot be ignored where recovery may affect the continuance of the business.

Conclusion: The order was set aside to the limited extent that it failed to consider financial hardship, and the Tribunal was directed to reconsider the stay application on that aspect and pass an appropriate order.

Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded only to the limited extent of securing reconsideration of the stay condition on the ground of financial hardship, while the remaining aspects were not disturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: A stay order imposing a deposit condition must address a party's pleaded financial incapacity, and failure to consider that relevant factor warrants interference and fresh consideration.

---