Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (11) TMI 113 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal orders reassessment in slump sale case, stresses verification of payments for accurate capital gains calculation. The Tribunal remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for further investigation regarding the MGT waiver and actual sale consideration in a slump sale ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal orders reassessment in slump sale case, stresses verification of payments for accurate capital gains calculation.

                              The Tribunal remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for further investigation regarding the MGT waiver and actual sale consideration in a slump sale dispute. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifying conditions precedent and actual payments to accurately calculate capital gains. The matter was sent back for the AO to gather necessary information to determine the correct amount of MGT payable and the entitlement to the withheld sum, directing a comprehensive review of the facts.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Determination of the full value of consideration received or accruing as a result of the transfer under a slump sale.
                              2. Computation of long-term capital loss (LTCL) on the slump sale.
                              3. Compliance with conditions precedent for the slump sale agreement.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Determination of the Full Value of Consideration Received or Accruing as a Result of the Transfer under a Slump Sale:
                              The primary issue in this case revolves around the determination of the full value of consideration received or accruing from the transfer of the Kochi terminal under a slump sale. The Assessee argued that the sale consideration should be Rs. 20,50,00,000, as they failed to fulfill the condition of obtaining a waiver of Minimum Guarantee Throughput (MGT) from Cochin Port Trust (CPT). Consequently, the Assessee contended that the withheld amount of Rs. 5,00,00,000 should not be included in the sale consideration. The Assessing Officer (AO), however, maintained that the full value of consideration was Rs. 25,50,00,000 as per the agreement, leading to a dispute over the actual consideration amount.

                              2. Computation of Long-Term Capital Loss (LTCL) on the Slump Sale:
                              The Assessee computed the LTCL at Rs. 9,19,09,841 by deducting the net worth of the Kochi undertaking (Rs. 29,69,09,841) from the sale consideration received (Rs. 20,50,00,000). In contrast, the AO computed the LTCL at Rs. 4,19,09,841 by considering the sale consideration as Rs. 25,50,00,000. The Tribunal emphasized that the computation of capital gains arising from a slump sale is governed by Section 50B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which stipulates that the capital gains are calculated as the difference between the sale consideration and the net worth of the undertaking. The Tribunal noted that the net worth of the undertaking was undisputedly Rs. 29,69,09,841.

                              3. Compliance with Conditions Precedent for the Slump Sale Agreement:
                              The Tribunal examined the conditions precedent outlined in the agreement dated 16.3.2007 between the Assessee and KCPL. Clause 3.2.2 of the agreement specified that a sum of Rs. 5,60,00,000 would be retained by KCPL until certain conditions were fulfilled by the Assessee, including obtaining a waiver of MGT from CPT. Since the Assessee failed to obtain the MGT waiver, the Tribunal concluded that the consideration payable by KCPL was effectively reduced to Rs. 20,50,00,000. The Tribunal also highlighted the importance of reading the agreement as a whole, emphasizing that the consideration payable should be Rs. 20,50,00,000 in the absence of the MGT waiver.

                              Remand for Further Consideration:
                              The Tribunal acknowledged that the Assessee had faced difficulties in obtaining confirmation from KCPL and M/s. Aegis Logistics Ltd. regarding the actual payment and waiver of MGT. Consequently, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the AO for fresh consideration. The AO was directed to exercise his powers under the Act to obtain the necessary information from CPT and M/s. Aegis Logistics Ltd. to ascertain the exact amount of MGT payable and whether the Assessee was entitled to the withheld amount of Rs. 5,00,00,000.

                              Conclusion:
                              The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case to the AO for further investigation and verification of the facts related to the MGT waiver and the actual sale consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough examination of the conditions precedent and the actual payments made to determine the correct computation of capital gains arising from the slump sale.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found