Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be set aside for violation of principles of natural justice, including denial of personal hearing and opportunity to seek cross-examination.
Analysis: The objections filed against the revision notice specifically sought personal hearing and permission to summon the sellers for cross-examination. The impugned order did not deal with those objections in a meaningful manner, and the relied-on materials were not shown to have been supplied to the petitioner. The governing departmental circular also required grant of personal hearing, and a prior decision of the Court had clarified that even if objections are not filed, the assessing authority cannot deny a hearing. In these circumstances, the assessment was found to be procedurally unfair.
Conclusion: The assessment order was rightly set aside as violative of principles of natural justice, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after furnishing the relied-on materials and granting personal hearing.