Technical assistance for product improvement was not royalty where no right to use intellectual property was transferred.

Payment for technical assistance to design and improve an existing engine component was held not to be royalty, because the Austrian consultant merely rendered technical services and the assessee retained ownership of the engine design and deliverables. Standard confidentiality and intellectual property protection clauses in the agreement were treated as protective terms only, insufficient to create a licence or a right to use intellectual property. The payment was therefore characterised as fees for technical services rather than royalty, and the Revenue's challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the payment made under the technical assistance agreement for design and improvement of an engine component constituted royalty or fees for technical services and was taxable as royalty.

Analysis: The agreement was for design and improvement of an already developed engine owned by the assessee, with the work performed in Austria and the completed drawings delivered back to the assessee. The generic clauses in the general terms and conditions, including those protecting the Austrian company's know-how, patents, ideas, drawings and confidentiality, were held to be standard protective clauses and not enough to convert the arrangement into a licence or a transfer of a right to use intellectual property. The decisive feature was that the Austrian company rendered technical assistance for improving the assessee's product, and the assessee retained ownership of the engine design and related deliverables. Earlier decisions on similar agreements were found applicable, while the decisions relied on by the Revenue were distinguished on facts.

Conclusion: The payment did not constitute royalty and was in the nature of fees for technical services, not taxable as royalty.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the Revenue's challenge to the Tribunal's view was rejected, leaving the assessee's position undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: A payment for technical assistance that improves the assessee's own product does not become royalty merely because standard contractual clauses preserve the foreign consultant's intellectual property rights, unless the arrangement confers a right to use that property.

---