Substantial expansion exemption under excise notification upheld where installed capacity increase crossed the prescribed threshold.

Interpretation of Notification No. 50/03-CE required the appellant to show substantial expansion by increasing installed capacity by not less than 25%. The record, including the jurisdictional Range Superintendent's recommendation and the District Industries Centre report, showed an increase of 31% in installed capacity. As the notification's condition was therefore satisfied, exemption could not be denied and the appellant was entitled to the benefit under the notification.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 50/03-CE dated 10.6.2003 on the basis that it had undertaken substantial expansion by increasing installed capacity by not less than 25%.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the interpretation of the notification and whether the condition of substantial expansion was satisfied. The record included the jurisdictional Range Superintendent's recommendation and the District Industries Centre report, both indicating that the installed capacity had increased by 31%. On that basis, the condition prescribed by the notification stood fulfilled. The Tribunal therefore found no basis to deny the exemption.

Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 50/03-CE dated 10.6.2003.

---