Capital gains ruled as LTCG with Section 54EC deduction eligibility

The case involved the classification of capital gains from the sale of immovable property as Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) or Short Term Capital Gains (STCG) and the eligibility for deduction under Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the gains should be classified as LTCG as the holding period included the time held by the previous owner. Consequently, the assessee was deemed eligible for the deduction under Section 54EC, allowing for the nullification of the entire sale consideration. The appeal was allowed, and the decision was pronounced on 10th October 2018.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Classification of capital gains from the sale of immovable property as Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) or Short Term Capital Gains (STCG).
2. Eligibility for deduction under Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act.

Issue 1: Classification of Capital Gains
The primary issue revolves around whether the capital gains of Rs. 35,86,000/- from the sale of immovable property should be classified as Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) or Short Term Capital Gains (STCG). The assessee sold a property acquired through a family arrangement in August 2006 and claimed it as LTCG, seeking exemption under Section 54EC. The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] classified the gains as STCG, arguing that the property was held for less than 36 months from the date of family arrangement.

The assessee contended that the property was inherited from the grandmother who died intestate on 10/12/1999, and thus, the holding period should include the period held by the previous owner, making it LTCG. The AO disagreed, stating that the property was acquired by the assessee only in August 2006 through a family arrangement, not directly inherited, and hence, the gains were STCG.

Issue 2: Eligibility for Deduction under Section 54EC
The second issue is whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act. The AO and CIT(A) denied the deduction, asserting that since the gains were classified as STCG, the assessee was ineligible for the deduction under Section 54EC, which applies only to LTCG.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of Capital Gains:
The Tribunal analyzed the facts and statutory provisions, particularly Section 2(42A) and Section 49(1) of the Income Tax Act. It was noted that the property was inherited from the grandmother who died intestate, and the holding period should include the period held by the previous owner, as per Explanation 1(b) to Section 2(42A) and Section 49(1)(ii). The Tribunal emphasized that both inheritance and gift scenarios are covered under these sections, and thus, the holding period of the previous owner must be included in the assessee's holding period. Consequently, the gains were classified as LTCG.

2. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 54EC:
Given the classification of the gains as LTCG, the Tribunal held that the assessee was eligible for the deduction under Section 54EC. The assessee had invested Rs. 37 Lacs in eligible bonds, which nullified the entire sale consideration of Rs. 36.56 Lacs. The Tribunal drew strength from the Bombay High Court's decision in CIT Vs. Manjula J. Shah [355 ITR 474], which supported the inclusion of the previous owner's holding period for determining LTCG and the corresponding indexation benefits.

The Tribunal concluded that the assessee's gains were LTCG, making the assessee eligible for the deduction under Section 54EC. The appeal was allowed, and the order pronounced in the open court on 10th October 2018.

---