Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Penalties Upheld for Illegal Exports Involvement, Appeal Allowed for Lack of Awareness</h1> The appeal of M/s ICS Cargo was allowed as they were found unaware of the illegal activities. However, the penalties on Shri Praveen Kumar, M/s Dattar ... Smuggling - red sanders - absolute confiscation - penalty u/s 114(i) of CA for omissions and commissions which have rendering the subject goods liable for confiscation - Held that:- In the entire findings on the role played by M/s ICS Cargo, I find that the Adjudicating Authority has recorded, M/s ICS Cargo being CHA/Customs Broker as employer of Shri Praveen Kumar and said Shri Praveen Kumar master minded illegal export of red sander wood logs, are liable for penalty. In my view, the findings recorded by the Adjudicating Authority are unacceptable as there was no omission on the part of the appellant M/s ICS Cargo, as per statements recorded of Shri Praveen Kumar, wherein he stated that M/s ICS Cargo is not aware of the situation of his embarking into illegal export of red sander wood logs - penalty set aside. Penalty imposed on Shri Praveen Kumar & M/s Dattar Shipping & Logistics - Held that:- Shri Praveen Kumar was advising many people how to do the illegal export of red sander wood logs. Shri K. Somasekhar and Shri Pydi Raju have clearly stated that they were engaged in the export of red sanders under the advice of Shri Praveen Kumar - The findings recorded by the Adjudicating Authority in paragraph No. 30.2 of his Order-in-Original and also paragraph No. 30.3 clearly indicate the complicity of Shri Praveen Kumar in master minding the illegal export of red sander wood logs - penalty upheld. Penalty on Shri Pydi Raju - Held that:- It is on record that Shri K. Pydi Raju had received monetary consideration from Shri Praveen Kumar for illegal exports of red sanders and it is also not disputed during the search operations in his residence, unaccounted cash of β‚Ή 24 lakhs were found which can be considered as sale proceeds of illegal export of red sandal woods - penalty upheld. Penalty on Shri K. Soma Sekhar - Held that:- Adjudicating Authority has clearly brought out on record that various rubber stamps of the customs officers were recovered from his residence and he had agreed and admitted to the said fact - penalty upheld. Appeal allowed in part. Issues:- Imposition of penalties under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on various individuals for involvement in illegal export of red sander wood logs.Detailed Analysis:1. Background and Investigation:The appeals were against an Order-in-Original related to the illegal export of red sander wood logs. Intelligence revealed a smuggling operation, leading to the interception of containers at Visakhapatnam Port. Statements were recorded, show cause notices issued, and penalties imposed under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962.2. Arguments by Appellants:The appellants contested the penalties, arguing lack of involvement in the illegal activities. For instance, M/s Dattar Shipping and Logistics Pvt. Ltd. claimed innocence, stating they were merely involved in container booking. Other appellants challenged the validity of statements and panchanamas, seeking cross-examination.3. Departmental Representative's Submission:The Departmental Representative highlighted the roles of the appellants in the illegal export scheme, emphasizing admissions and evidence linking them to the activities. Monetary considerations, fabrication of documents, and unexplained cash were key points.4. Judicial Findings:- M/s ICS Cargo: The penalty on M/s ICS Cargo was deemed incorrect as they were unaware of the illegal activities, leading to the allowance of their appeal.- Shri Praveen Kumar & M/s Dattar Shipping: The penalties on these appellants were upheld due to their direct involvement and facilitation of the illegal exports.- Shri Pydi Raju: His role as a facilitator in the scheme was established, justifying the penalty imposed.- Shri K. Somasekhar: His possession of unauthorized rubber stamps and lack of valid explanations supported the penalty under Section 114(i).5. Final Decision:The appeal of M/s ICS Cargo was allowed, while appeals of Shri Praveen Kumar, M/s Dattar Shipping and Logistics Pvt. Ltd., Shri K. Pydi Raju, and Shri K. Somasekhar were rejected. The penalties imposed under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 were upheld based on the established roles and evidence presented.This comprehensive analysis outlines the key aspects of the legal judgment, including the background, arguments presented, departmental submissions, judicial findings, and the final decision on the penalties imposed in the case of illegal export of red sander wood logs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found