Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Tribunal upholds rejection of petition on preferential transaction under Insolvency Code</h1> The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to reject the petition under Section 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code concerning a ... Application u/s 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Preferential transactions and relevant time - Held that:- Admittedly, the 2nd Respondent is not a related party to the Corporate Debtor and therefore, for preferring an application under Section 43 in respect to transaction made with 2nd Respondent one has to refer to clause (b) of Sub- section (4) of Section 43. In the said provision the period of one year preceding the insolvency commencement date is prescribed to find out whether any preferential transaction was made in favour of any person other than the related party. Admittedly, the insolvency commencement date (date of admission) in the present case is 16.06.2017, the execution of Sale Deed reached finality on 30.05.2016 that is much prior to one year preceding the insolvency commencement dated. In that view of the aforesaid finding we hold that the application under Section 43 of I&B Code in respect of 2nd Respondent was not maintainable and the Adjudicating Authority has rightly rejected the petition. Issues involved:1. Preferential transaction under Section 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.Analysis:1. The appeal was filed by the Resolution Professional/Liquidator against the order rejecting the application under Section 43 of the I&B Code. The dispute centered around a preferential transaction made by the Corporate Debtor in favor of the 2nd Respondent through a Sale Deed. The key argument was whether the final payment for the transaction was made before or after the execution of the Sale Deed.2. The Appellant contended that the Corporate Debtor executed a Sale Deed on 30.05.2016, with the final payment being completed between 30.06.2016 and 14.10.2016. On the other hand, the 2nd Respondent disputed this claim, stating that the consideration amount was paid to the Corporate Debtor before the Sale Deed through Demand Drafts, which were credited to the Corporate Debtor on 30.06.2016 and 14.10.2016.3. The crucial point of contention was the timing of the payment in relation to the execution of the Sale Deed. The Tribunal held that since the Demand Drafts were prepared before 30.05.2016 and were considered as part of the consideration amount in the Sale Deed, the sale was deemed complete on 30.05.2016. The exact date of deposit into the Corporate Debtor's account did not alter the completion date of the transaction.4. Section 43 of the I&B Code deals with preferential transactions and the relevant time for such transactions. It outlines the conditions under which a preference is deemed to have been given, including transfers for the benefit of creditors that put them in a more advantageous position than they would have been under normal asset distribution.5. As per the provisions of Section 43, a preference is considered to have been given at a relevant time if it involves a related party within two years preceding the insolvency commencement date, or to a non-related party within one year preceding the said date. In this case, since the transaction with the 2nd Respondent was completed on 30.05.2016, well before the one-year period preceding the insolvency commencement date of 16.06.2017, the application under Section 43 against the 2nd Respondent was deemed not maintainable.6. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Adjudicating Authority to reject the petition under Section 43 of the I&B Code concerning the 2nd Respondent, as the transaction in question did not fall within the prescribed period preceding the insolvency commencement date. The appeal was dismissed on the grounds of lack of merit, with no costs awarded.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key legal arguments, interpretations of relevant provisions, and the final decision reached by the Appellate Tribunal.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found