Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether litigation expenditure incurred in proceedings for enhancement of compensation on compulsory acquisition is expenditure wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer of a capital asset and deductible in computing capital gains.
Analysis: The computation provisions under Section 48 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 allow deduction of expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer. A compulsory acquisition is not complete until compensation is finally determined, and proceedings for enhancement of compensation are intrinsically and intimately connected with the acquisition. The timing of the expenditure, by itself, is not decisive if the expenditure is directly connected with the transfer.
Conclusion: Such litigation expenditure is deductible under Section 48 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 if it is proved to have been incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the compulsory acquisition. The adverse view that it is disallowed merely because it was incurred after the award is incorrect.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for litigation arising from compulsory acquisition is deductible under the capital gains provisions if it has an intrinsic and direct connection with the transfer, irrespective of whether it was incurred before or after the award.