Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the availability of an appellate remedy barred writ jurisdiction in the facts of the case, and whether the assessment orders were vitiated by violation of natural justice and non-application of mind.
Analysis: The assessment orders merely reproduced the show cause notices and the dealer's objections, without dealing with the specific contentions raised in reply or the documents sought for verification. The only basis stated for the additions was an alleged admission made during inspection, which was not treated as sufficient to sustain the reassessment. In tax matters, while an alternate statutory remedy is ordinarily relevant, it does not operate as an absolute bar where the impugned order is passed in defiance of fundamental procedural requirements or in violation of natural justice. The Court found that the impugned assessments fell within those exceptions because they reflected total non-application of mind and failure to consider the objections.
Conclusion: The writ jurisdiction was properly invoked notwithstanding the alternate remedy, and the assessment orders were unsustainable for breach of natural justice and non-application of mind.
Final Conclusion: The appellate and writ orders were set aside, the assessments were quashed, and the matters were remitted for fresh consideration after furnishing the mismatch details and hearing the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: The existence of an appellate remedy does not bar writ relief where a tax assessment is shown to suffer from violation of natural justice and a complete failure to apply mind to the objections raised.