Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional assessment disallowing exemption on interstate purchase of building materials could be sustained when the notice of proposal did not disclose the material particulars and grounds later relied upon in the assessment order.
Analysis: The exemption claimed under Section 3B(2)(b) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 had been accepted in the original assessment. The notice proposing revision did not contain the factual basis or material particulars necessary to meet the proposed disallowance. The reasons ultimately used in the revisional order were introduced for the first time in the final order and were not part of the notice, depriving the assessee of an effective opportunity to answer the case against it. The merits of the exemption claim were not examined finally because the interference was made on the ground of procedural unfairness.
Conclusion: The revisional order could not be sustained for want of proper notice and compliance with natural justice, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after issuing a detailed notice.