Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessable value of the imported cooling pads could be enhanced on the basis of contemporaneous imports, and if so, whether the lowest contemporaneous price or the average price was required to be adopted.
Analysis: The imported goods were compared with contemporaneous imports of similar or identical goods, and the declared value was found to be substantially lower than the comparable import prices. The valuation machinery under customs law was therefore held to be applicable. However, where more than one comparable transaction value was available, the appropriate course was to adopt the lowest value from the comparable range rather than the average value. On that basis, the value enhancement made at Rs. 220 per kg could not be sustained when the lowest contemporaneous value was Rs. 180 per kg.
Conclusion: The enhancement to Rs. 220 per kg was set aside to that extent, and the matter was sent back for redetermination of duty on the basis of Rs. 180 per kg, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent that the matter was remitted for reassessment on a lower comparable value.
Ratio Decidendi: For customs valuation based on contemporaneous identical imports, where multiple comparable values exist, the lowest comparable transaction value must be adopted.