1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>The Authority for Advance Ruling in Uttar Pradesh ruled in favor of the taxpayer in a recent case.</h1> The Authority for Advance Ruling in Uttar Pradesh ruled in favor of the taxpayer in a recent case. - 2018 (17) G.S.T.L. 55 (A. A. R. - GST) Classification of an item - Peeled Sliced Pineapple, put up in airtight unit container in sugar syrup. Held that:- Canned Pineapple Slices, dipped in Sugar Syrup comes within Tariff item no. 2008 and N/N. 01/2017-C.T. (Rate) dated 28-06-2017 issued by Central Government and Notification KANI-2-836/XI-9(47)/17-U.P. Act-1-2017-Order-(06)-2017 dated 30-06-2017, schedule-II and taxable at 6% CGST and 6% SGST. The judgment is by the Authority for Advance Ruling in Uttar Pradesh with members Shri Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Dinesh Kumar.