Annual maintenance service with spare parts deemed composite supply; tax based on Service Code for services.

The ruling determined that the comprehensive annual maintenance service, including spare parts, qualifies as a composite supply. It established that the principal supply in the contract is the service itself, with incidental supply of goods. Taxability for goods was deemed irrelevant as the contract primarily involved services. The applicable tax rate for services was determined based on the Service Code for maintenance and repair services. The ruling also addressed the relevant place of supply and type of tax to be discharged, particularly focusing on services provided on-board a train and inter-State supply implications.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Classification of comprehensive annual maintenance service as composite supply or mixed supply.
2. Determination of principal supply between goods or services in a composite supply contract.
3. Taxability determination for goods supplied under a composite supply contract.
4. Applicable tax rate for services in a composite supply contract.
5. Relevant place of supply and type of tax to be discharged in the contract.

Analysis:
1. The applicant sought clarification on whether the comprehensive annual maintenance service, which may involve the supply of spare parts, should be classified as a composite supply or mixed supply. The ruling determined that since the maintenance service is provided for a fixed price with or without spare parts and is naturally bundled with the supply of goods, it qualifies as a composite supply.

2. In the case of the composite supply contract, the ruling established that the principal supply is the service itself, as the supply of goods is merely incidental to the maintenance contract based on the facts presented.

3. The ruling found that taxability determination for goods under the composite supply contract was not applicable as the contract primarily involved the supply of services, making the question of goods being the principal supply irrelevant.

4. Regarding the applicable tax rate for services in the composite supply contract, the ruling referred to the Service Code for maintenance and repair services of transport machinery and equipment, with the prescribed GST rates of CGST @ 9%, SGST @ 9%, or IGST @ 18% of the taxable value.

5. The ruling addressed the relevant place of supply and type of tax to be discharged in the contract. It highlighted that if the service provider and recipient are in India, the place of supply is determined as per Section 12 of the IGST Act, with specific provisions for services provided on-board a train and the implications for inter-State supply of services.

This detailed analysis of the judgment provides a comprehensive overview of the issues involved and the rulings provided by the Authority for Advance Ruling in Uttar Pradesh.

---