TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 was beyond the legislative competence of Parliament; (ii) Whether the Act violated the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 or was a colourable legislation; (iii) Whether levy of compensation cess in addition to GST on the same taxable event was permissible in law; (iv) Whether credit or set-off of Clean Energy Cess already paid was available against compensation cess.
Issue (i): Whether the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 was beyond the legislative competence of Parliament
Analysis: Cess is a species of tax. The constitutional scheme, read with Article 246A, Article 248, Article 270 and Section 18 of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, enabled Parliament to enact a law providing compensation to States for loss of revenue arising from GST implementation. No entry in List II or List III excluded the field, and the power to legislate for compensation included the power to provide for a cess for that purpose.
Conclusion: The Act was within the legislative competence of Parliament and the challenge failed.
Issue (ii): Whether the Act violated the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 or was a colourable legislation
Analysis: The constitutional amendment aimed at subsuming various indirect taxes, cesses and surcharges into the GST regime, but it did not prohibit Parliament from levying a compensatory cess under an express constitutional mandate. The phrase "with respect to" in Article 246A was construed broadly, and the impugned enactment was held to be an implementation measure under the constitutional framework rather than a device to defeat it.
Conclusion: The Act did not violate the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 and was not a colourable legislation.
Issue (iii): Whether levy of compensation cess in addition to GST on the same taxable event was permissible in law
Analysis: A taxable event may attract more than one impost if the levies operate on different aspects and are distinct in law. The compensation cess was treated as an increment to GST, imposed for a separate statutory purpose of compensating States, and therefore the presence of GST levy did not invalidate the cess on the ground of overlap.
Conclusion: Levy of compensation cess along with GST was permissible in law.
Issue (iv): Whether credit or set-off of Clean Energy Cess already paid was available against compensation cess
Analysis: Clean Energy Cess and compensation cess were enacted for different objects, collected under different schemes, and distributed differently. The statutory framework contained no provision granting set-off of the earlier cess against the later levy, and such credit could not be claimed as of right.
Conclusion: No set-off of Clean Energy Cess against compensation cess was allowable.
Final Conclusion: The constitutional and statutory challenges to the compensation cess failed, the cess was upheld as a valid fiscal measure, and the claimed credit for prior Clean Energy Cess was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Constitution expressly authorises Parliament to provide compensation for GST-related revenue loss, Parliament may validly levy a compensatory cess as an increment to GST, and such levy is not invalid merely because GST is also charged on the underlying transaction.
TaxTMI 
