Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to refund of proportionate central excise duty paid for the period during which the cold rolling machines were not operational under the special procedure notified for stainless steel patta/patti manufacturers.
Analysis: The special procedure under Notification No. 17/2007-C.E. dated 01.03.2007, issued under Rule 15 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, fixes duty by reference to installed cold rolling machines. Once machines were dismantled or not functioning for part of the relevant months, duty could not be demanded for the non-operational period. The reasoning adopted by the lower authorities that the appellant was not a first-time entrant under the scheme was held to be unsustainable. The refund claim was also supported by the principle that excise duty is leviable on manufacture, and excess duty paid for a period when machines were not in existence or not working is refundable under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to proportionate refund of duty for the days when the machines were not operational.
Ratio Decidendi: Under a compounded levy or special procedure scheme based on installed machinery, duty is not payable for periods when the machinery is dismantled or non-operational, and excess duty paid for such periods is refundable.