Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of service tax paid on goods transport agency services used for bringing empty containers from the container yard to the factory for stuffing and export was admissible under the export-related exemption notifications.
Analysis: The relevant notifications exempted services provided to an exporter in relation to transport of export goods from the place of removal to the port, inland container depot, or airport. The expression "in relation to transport of export goods" was held to be wide enough to cover the movement of empty containers to the factory as an integral step in exporting the goods, because export of stuffed containers would not be possible without first bringing the empty containers for loading. The prior consistent view on the same language was followed, and the principle of strict construction of exemption notifications did not assist the revenue where the wording itself created no real doubt.
Conclusion: Refund was admissible, and the appellant was entitled to the benefit of the exemption for the GTA service used to transport empty containers to the factory for export purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: Where exemption language covers services provided in relation to transport of export goods, it extends to ancillary transport of empty containers to the factory when that movement is an essential part of exporting the goods.