Tribunal clarifies service tax liability on commissions for specific services

The Tribunal confirmed the demand for service tax on the commission received for using the Galileo Centralized Reservation System (CRS) under Business Auxiliary Service. However, it dismissed the service tax liability on the commission received for promoting Western Union Money Transfer Services, treating it as "Export of Services." No penalty was imposed due to the litigious nature of the issues. The appeal was partly allowed and partly dismissed, clarifying the tax liability on commissions received for specific services and distinguishing between taxable and non-taxable activities under the service tax regime.

---

---

Issues:
1. Alleged commission received for using Galileo Centralized Reservation System (CRS) - Whether it falls under Business Auxiliary Service and is liable for service tax.
2. Commission received for promoting Western Union Money Transfer Services - Whether it is liable for service tax and penalty.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Alleged commission received for using Galileo CRS
The Department claimed that the commission received for using the Galileo CRS falls under Business Auxiliary Service, leading to a demand for service tax. The Original Authority and Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this view. The Tribunal referred to previous decisions, including the case of New Royal Link Travels and Ors. Vs. CST, Chennai, and held that such commissions are indeed liable for service tax under Business Auxiliary Service. The demand for service tax of &8377; 2,34,683/- with interest was deemed legally correct and justified, and the Tribunal confirmed this part of the impugned order.

Issue 2: Commission received for promoting Western Union Money Transfer Services
Regarding the commission received for promoting Western Union Money Transfer Services, the Tribunal considered the case law of Muthoot Fincorp. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Visakhapatnam, which held that benefits accruing to a person outside India are not liable for service tax under Business Auxiliary Services. Additionally, the Tribunal cited the decision in Western Union Financial Services Inc. Vs. C.S.T., Delhi, where it was held that the activity involved the export of services. Consequently, the commission received for activities related to Western Union Money Transfer Services was treated as "Export of Services," and the service tax liability of &8377; 2,60,270/- with interest was dismissed.

Penalty
Regarding the penalty, the Tribunal noted that both disputed issues were subject to litigation, and thus, no penalty could be imposed in such circumstances. Despite upholding the demand related to Galileo CRS, the Tribunal ruled that no penalty should be levied. The appeal was partly allowed and partly dismissed based on the above terms.

This judgment clarifies the tax liability concerning commissions received for using specific services and highlights the distinction between taxable and non-taxable activities under the service tax regime.

---