Tribunal rules UI charges not taxable under Service Tax The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Unscheduled Inter-change (UI) charges received were not subject to Service Tax. The appellant's ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal rules UI charges not taxable under Service Tax
The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Unscheduled Inter-change (UI) charges received were not subject to Service Tax. The appellant's argument that UI charges were part of electricity transmission, falling under the negative list exempt from Service Tax, was accepted. The Tribunal found that receiving UI charges did not entail refraining from supplying electricity, leading to the appeal being allowed and the Service Tax demand on UI charges being set aside.
Issues: Service Tax liability on Unscheduled Inter-change charges (UI) received by the appellant.
Analysis: The appellant, engaged in manufacturing iron and steel products and electricity generation, appealed against the Order-in-Appeal demanding Service Tax on UI charges. The Department argued that UI charges fall under Declared Service as per Section 66E (e) of the Finance Act, 1994. The lower authorities ordered payment of Service Tax, leading to the appeal.
The appellant contended that UI charges were part of the tariff billed per Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's orders. They argued that transmission of electricity falls under the negative list entry of Section 66D(k), which exempts it from Service Tax. The appellant emphasized that they did not agree to refrain from transmission but received UI charges as per regulations.
The Department cited CBEC Circular No. 192/02/2016-ST, clarifying Service Tax on fines and penalties not applicable to UI charges. However, they insisted that UI charges were a declared service subject to Service Tax. After hearing both sides, the crux of the dispute was whether UI charges incurred Service Tax liability. The Revenue authorities viewed it as a Declared Service under Section 66E (e), implying an obligation to refrain from an act.
The Tribunal analyzed that UI charges arose from electricity transmission by the appellant and were part of the billing related to electricity supply. Since transmission of electricity is in the negative list of services, it was deemed not to constitute a service liable to Service Tax. The Tribunal concluded that receiving UI charges did not imply agreeing to refrain from supplying electricity, thus setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI OCR ✕
of 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
