Appeal Granted: Duty Leviable on Manufactured Goods Only under Compounded Levy Scheme

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that duty is leviable only on manufactured goods under the compounded levy scheme. Refund claims for non-functional machines were deemed valid based on legal provisions and precedents. The excess duty paid due to one inoperative machine not producing goods warranted a refund, as no duty can be levied in the absence of production. The order-in-appeal was considered meritless, and the appellant was granted consequential relief in accordance with the law.

---

---

Issues:
Refund claim under compounded levy scheme for non-operative machine.

Analysis:
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing S.S. Patta Patti, deposited compounded central excise duty for 9 machines under a special procedure for compound levy scheme. When one machine became inoperative, a refund claim of Rs. 37,419 was filed for the non-operative period. The claim was rejected by the Divisional Assistant Commissioner citing lack of provision for reduction in duty if a machine is non-functional. The Commissioner (Appeals) also rejected the claim, stating that the appellant must pay full duty for the month as they did not opt for the scheme for the first time. The appellant argued that duty is leviable only on manufacturing excisable goods and cited legal provisions and judgments supporting refund claims for non-functional machines.

The Tribunal noted that excess duty of Rs. 37,419 was paid due to one machine being inoperative after advance payment for all machines. Refund claims for non-operational periods have been allowed in previous judgments like Jupiter Industries vs. CCE, Jaipur. The Tribunal referred to the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court's order, emphasizing that no duty can be levied if no production occurs, and refund is warranted in such cases. As the inoperative machine did not produce any goods after duty payment, it cannot be subject to compounded levy of central excise duty. The order-in-appeal was deemed without merit, and the appellant's appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the legal principle that duty is leviable on manufactured goods and refund claims for non-functional machines are valid under the compounded levy scheme. The decision was based on legal provisions, precedents, and the absence of production from the inoperative machine, leading to excess duty payment warranting a refund.

---