Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim of service tax paid on construction of CRPF barracks was payable to the assessee, and whether the rejection of refund without issuance of show cause notice and without personal hearing could be sustained.
Analysis: The refund was rejected without issuing a show cause notice and without granting a personal hearing, which violated the principles of natural justice. On merits, the assessee was a sub-contractor constructing barracks for training of CRPF personnel, which was not the same as construction of residential houses by NBCC. The departmental circular relied upon by the Revenue was held inapplicable to the facts. In the absence of a valid notice, the objections based on limitation and unjust enrichment were also held not sustainable.
Conclusion: The rejection of refund of Rs. 51,05,157/- was not sustainable and the assessee was held entitled to the refund.
Ratio Decidendi: A refund claim cannot be rejected without observance of natural justice, and a circular applicable to construction of residential houses cannot be applied to construction of non-commercial barracks for training purposes.