2018 (9) TMI 1196 - AT - Central Excise

Tribunal remands duty refund determination under Rule 5, Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000

M/s UAL-UTTAR Pradesh Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad

M/s UAL-UTTAR Pradesh Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad - TMI Issues:Provisional assessment under Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000.Analysis:The appeal arose from Order-in-Appeal No.145/CE/ALLD/2010 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Allahabad. The appellants, engaged in the manufacture of Asbestos Cement Products, were clearing goods on payment of duty from the factory and transferring goods to Depots and Consignment Agents. The duty for goods transferred to Depots and Consignment Agents was paid at their premises during clearance due to unknown transportation costs in advance, leading to provisional assessments. The assessments were finalized by the Original Authority invoking Rule 7 of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Original Authority's order, prompting the appellant to appeal before the Tribunal.The Tribunal, after hearing both sides, found that the issue was covered by a previous Final Order in the appellant's own case. Following Final Order No.71338/2018, the Tribunal determined that Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 would be applicable in this case. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the Original Authority. The Original Authority was directed to re-determine the duty payable by the assessee or the refund payable to the assessee by invoking the provisions of Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, providing clarity on the application of Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 in the circumstances of the case.