Appeal Dismissed: Operational Creditor's Application Rejected under Insolvency Code

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal filed by an 'Operational Creditor' against the dismissal of their application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal found that the respondent had raised valid disputes prior to the demand notice, including issues related to work completion, deductions, and tonnage claims, which were not adequately addressed by the appellant. Due to unresolved factual disputes, the Tribunal upheld the decision that the application was not suitable for admission, ultimately affirming the dismissal of the application.

---

---

Issues: Dismissal of application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 due to the existence of a dispute.

The judgment by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, involved an appeal filed by an 'Operational Creditor' against the dismissal of their application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by the Adjudicating Authority. The appellant argued that despite the respondent admitting the dues, the Adjudicating Authority wrongly relied on other evidence to establish the existence of a dispute. The appellant pointed to an email dated 12th July, 2017, as evidence of the respondent admitting the dues.

Upon reviewing the records, the Tribunal noted that prior to the demand notice issued on 7th July, 2017, the respondent had raised disputes regarding non-submission of work completion certificate, non-completion of work, deductions for lead piping, non-removal of scrap material charges, and an exorbitant tonnage claim made by the appellant. The respondent had contended before the Adjudicating Authority that there was indeed an 'existence of dispute'. The Tribunal observed that there was no evidence to indicate any corrective action taken by the appellant in response to these disputes.

Given the factual disputes regarding the removal of scrap material, correction of the tonnage claim, and any deductions or reductions made, the Tribunal held that such issues could not be determined by the Adjudicating Authority. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the decision that the application under Section 9 was not suitable for admission. The appeal was found to lack merit and was accordingly dismissed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi.

---

---