Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>ITAT upholds 8% profit rate estimation, adds 18,86,442 to income, directs deduction of partner's salary & interest</h1> The ITAT confirmed the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision to estimate the net profit rate at 8%, adding &8377;18,86,442 to the declared income. The ITAT upheld the ... Estimation of income - Net profit assessment @ 8% - Best judgement assessment - deduction of salary paid to partners - Held that:- CIT(A) that in the absence of the major details of expenses which were not produced for verification and in presence of certain lacunae on the part of the assessee as observed above by the Ld. CIT(A) estimation of net profit @ 8% of gross turnover cannot be said to be unjustified. The observation made by the CIT(A) does not call for any interference and thus we do not hesitate to confirm the same. However, the salary of the partners and interest of the partner’s capital account cannot be clubbed in such addition made by the authorities below. We, therefore, find it fit and proper to remit the issue to the file of the AO to deduct the salary paid to the partners in the relevant year and the interest to partners capital accounts as paid from the total addition of β‚Ή 18,86,442/-. With this direction, we partly allow the appeal filed by the assessee for statistical purposes. Issues:Estimation of net profit rate at 8% by Ld. CIT(A) | Excessive income estimation by Ld. CIT(A) | Rejection of books of accounts by Ld. CIT(A) | Reliability of assessee's records | Consideration of partner's salary and interest | Confirmation of addition by ITATEstimation of Net Profit Rate at 8%:The appeal was filed against the Ld. CIT(A)'s order adopting a net profit rate of 8%, contending it was excessive and not based on the assessee's records or turnover. The Ld. CIT(A) added &8377; 18,86,442 to the declared income of &8377; 8,46,472. The ITAT upheld the estimation, noting the AO's inability to verify due to lack of compliance by the assessee. The ITAT agreed with the Ld. CIT(A)'s observation that in the absence of expense details and unreliability of records, the 8% estimation was justified. However, the ITAT directed the AO to deduct partner's salary and interest from the addition.Excessive Income Estimation:The main grievance of the assessee was the excessive income estimation by the Ld. CIT(A) at &8377; 27,32,914 compared to the declared income of &8377; 8,46,472. The ITAT found that the Ld. CIT(A) based the estimation on the net profit rate of 8% of the turnover, which was upheld due to the assessee's failure to provide necessary details and unreliable records. The ITAT partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the deduction of partner's salary and interest from the total addition.Rejection of Books of Accounts:The Ld. CIT(A) rejected the books of accounts due to discrepancies and unreliability, leading to the computation of net profit at 8% of the turnover. The ITAT concurred with this decision, emphasizing the incomplete nature of records, lack of verification, and dilatory tactics by the assessee. The ITAT upheld the rejection of books but directed the deduction of partner's salary and interest from the total addition.Reliability of Assessee's Records:The ITAT noted discrepancies in the assessee's records, including incomplete salary and wages registers, missing purchase bills, and cash expenditures without evidence. The unreliability of records led to the rejection of books by the Ld. CIT(A) and the subsequent estimation of net profit at 8% of the turnover. The ITAT supported this decision based on the inadequacies in the documentation provided by the assessee.Consideration of Partner's Salary and Interest:The ITAT directed the AO to consider the deduction of partner's salary and interest from the total addition of &8377; 18,86,442. While upholding the 8% net profit estimation, the ITAT emphasized the need to exclude partner-related expenses from the addition. This direction was given to ensure a fair assessment of the income and to address the specific issue raised by the assessee during the appeal.Confirmation of Addition by ITAT:Ultimately, the ITAT partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, confirming the addition of &8377; 18,86,442 while directing the deduction of partner's salary and interest. The ITAT upheld the estimation of net profit at 8% of the turnover, considering the unreliability of the assessee's records and the failure to provide necessary details for verification. The decision aimed to balance the assessment process by addressing the specific concerns raised during the appeal.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found