Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty proceedings under sections 271(1)(a) and 273 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were validly initiated in the course of the assessment proceedings.
Analysis: Under the 1922 Act, the statutory scheme required the assessing authority to be satisfied during the proceedings that a default attracting penalty had occurred, but the 1961 Act introduced a further requirement by section 275 that some positive step for initiation of penalty proceedings must be taken before completion of the assessment. A mere observation in the assessment order that penalty proceedings were to be initiated separately does not amount to initiation. A valid initiation may be shown by an actual penalty notice, a direction for issue of notice, a reference to the IAC, or some similar affirmative step taken before the assessment ends. On the facts, the assessment order contained no direction to issue penalty notice, and the notices were issued only after completion of the assessment.
Conclusion: The penalty proceedings were not validly initiated in the course of the assessment proceedings, and the cancellation of the penalties was justified.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purposes of section 275 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, penalty proceedings are initiated only when the assessing authority takes a definite affirmative step before completion of the assessment; a mere statement that penalty proceedings will be initiated separately is insufficient.