Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was required to make pre-deposit of the confirmed duty and whether recovery should be stayed pending appeal in view of the dispute on inclusion of an alleged amount in the assessable value.
Analysis: The appellant's case was that the amount attributed to the purchaser's employees stationed at the factory was not collected by the manufacturer and had no nexus with the transaction value. The revenue had not, at the prima facie stage, shown that the alleged Rs. 2 per litre formed part of the cost of manufacture or the assessable value. On this limited scrutiny, the appellant established a prima facie case.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the duty demand was stayed till disposal of the appeal.