TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of Assessee, overturning addition based on peak credit theory.</h1> <h3>Sh. Pawan Malhotra Versus Income tax officer Ward-1 (2), Jammu</h3> Sh. Pawan Malhotra Versus Income tax officer Ward-1 (2), Jammu - [2018] 66 ITR (Trib) 368 Issues:Appeal against order passed by Ld. CIT(A) under Income Tax Act, 1961 - Addition of Rs. 16,70,206 based on peak credit theory - Challenge to the assessment order - Discrepancy in cash deposits in bank account - Assessee's appeal allowed.Analysis:The appeal was filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) under the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the addition of Rs. 16,70,206 made by the Assessing Officer based on the peak credit theory. The Assessee, a Doctor running a Diagnostics Center, declared a gross turnover of Rs. 13,43,594 in the income and expenditure accounts. The Assessing Officer observed cash deposits amounting to Rs. 30,13,800 in the bank account from April 1, 2005, to March 31, 2006. The Assessee failed to provide satisfactory clarification, leading to the addition of Rs. 16,70,206 to the income based on undisclosed sales using the peak credit theory. The Ld. CIT(A) affirmed this addition, partly allowing relief to the Assessee.The Assessee challenged the addition before the Appellate Tribunal, arguing that the Assessing Officer's application of the peak credit theory was not sustainable. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the assessment, as a portion of the deposited amount pertained to a subsequent year. The Assessee's cash deposits were fully explainable and reconcilable with the ledger account, as they were routed through the cash book. The Tribunal found the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision contrary to the facts and documents on record, leading to the deletion of the Rs. 16,70,206 addition.During the proceedings, the Ld. DR did not present any contrary material or defects in the Assessee's ledger account and bank statement to refute the claim. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the Assessee's appeal, setting aside the addition of Rs. 16,70,206. The Tribunal emphasized that the addition was not sustainable, given the reconcilable nature of the cash deposits and the absence of evidence supporting the Assessing Officer's peak credit theory. The order in favor of the Assessee was pronounced on April 11, 2018.
TaxTMI 