Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal grants deductions for interest income from cooperative bank under Income Tax Act</h1> <h3>M/s. The Veer Cooperative Group Housing Society Limited Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-39 (4), New Delhi</h3> M/s. The Veer Cooperative Group Housing Society Limited Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-39 (4), New Delhi - [2018] 67 ITR (Trib) 268 Issues Involved:1. Taxability of interest income received from a Cooperative Bank under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.2. Entitlement to a deduction of Rs. 50,000 under Section 80P(2)(c)(ii) of the Income Tax Act.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Taxability of Interest Income from a Cooperative BankFacts:The assessee, a Cooperative Group Housing Society, declared NIL income and claimed exemption on the ground of mutuality. The society received interest income from Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) with Canara Bank and Saraswat Cooperative Bank Ltd., amounting to Rs. 7,47,298/-. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) taxed this interest income under the head 'Income from other sources,' citing the Supreme Court judgment in Bangalore Club vs. CIT, which held that interest income earned from banks has a taint of commerciality and is not covered by the principle of mutuality.Assessee's Argument:The assessee contended that the interest income from Saraswat Cooperative Bank Ltd. should be exempt under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, which provides for a deduction in respect of any income by way of interest or dividend derived by a Cooperative Society from its investments with any other Cooperative Society. The assessee argued that Cooperative Banks are essentially Cooperative Societies and thus should be covered under this provision.CIT(A)'s Decision:The CIT(A) rejected the assessee's claim, stating that Saraswat Cooperative Bank Ltd. is a bank and not a Cooperative Society, thus not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d).Tribunal's Analysis:The Tribunal referred to various judgments, including the Karnataka High Court's decision in Pr. CIT vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society, which held that Cooperative Banks are a species of the genus Cooperative Societies and thus eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal also cited multiple ITAT decisions supporting this view.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the interest earned from Saraswat Cooperative Bank Ltd. qualifies for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) and set aside the CIT(A)'s order, deleting the addition of Rs. 6,63,611/-.Issue 2: Entitlement to Deduction of Rs. 50,000 under Section 80P(2)(c)(ii)Facts:The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 50,000 under Section 80P(2)(c)(ii), which provides for a deduction in respect of income of Cooperative Societies engaged in activities other than those specified in clause (a) or (b).Assessee's Argument:The assessee argued that it is entitled to this deduction and cited the Supreme Court's judgment in CIT vs. Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Co., Ltd., which held that it is the duty of the A.O. to apply relevant provisions of the Act for determining the true figure of the assessee's total income.CIT(A)'s Decision:The CIT(A) acknowledged that the assessee is a Cooperative Society and thus eligible for the deduction but rejected the claim because it was not made in the return of income or through a revised return, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Goetze (India) Ltd. vs. CIT.Tribunal's Analysis:The Tribunal referred to the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT vs. Jai Parabolic Springs Ltd., which held that there is no prohibition on the Tribunal's power to entertain an additional ground for the just decision of the case. The Tribunal also cited the CBDT Circular No.14(XL-35), which directs the A.O. to apply relevant provisions for determining the true figure of the assessee's total income.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for a deduction of Rs. 50,000 under Section 80P(2)(c)(ii), directing the A.O. to allow this deduction.Summary:The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee. It held that the interest income from Saraswat Cooperative Bank Ltd. is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) and directed the A.O. to allow the deduction of Rs. 50,000 under Section 80P(2)(c)(ii). The Tribunal's decision was based on various judicial precedents and the interpretation of relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found