Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 requires reversal or payment on clearance of electricity generated incidentally from a by-product arising in the manufacture of the final dutiable product.
Analysis: The input carbon black feed stock was used in the manufacture of carbon black, while lean gas emerged only as a by-product in the process and was burnt to generate heat for producing electricity. The reasoning applied was that a by-product arising incidentally during manufacture does not make the common input relatable to the exempt or nil-rated output so as to attract the restriction under Rule 6. The earlier coordinate bench decision in the appellant's own case had already held, following the principle underlying Rule 57D(1), that credit cannot be denied merely because a by-product is used for generation of electricity.
Conclusion: Rule 6 was held not applicable, and the demand raised on the value of electricity was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit cannot be denied or reversed under the rule governing exempted goods where the allegedly exempt output arises only as a by-product in the manufacture of the dutiable final product.