1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>CESTAT Allahabad: Appellant wins as revenue's claim of non-reversal of Cenvat credit deemed unsubstantiated.</h1> The CESTAT Allahabad ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the revenue's claim of non-reversal of Cenvat credit unsubstantiated. The demand of Rs. ... Non-reversal of Cenvat credit involved in the sale of plant & machinery - Validity of SCN - Held that:- The basis for issue of show cause notice was that A.G. Audit came to know from the partyβs balance sheet that party received βΉ 23.00 Lakhs during the year 2009-10 on account of sale of plant & machinery. Without producing any evidence that the appellant had availed any Cenvat credit in respect of such plant & machinery it was presumed that party had availed Cenvat credit and was required to reverse Cenvat Credit of βΉ 2,81,283/- - there is no basis for issue of said show cause notice since the burden was on Revenue to prove that appellant had availed Cenvat Credit - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. The appellate tribunal CESTAT Allahabad ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving a demand of Rs. 2,61,282 for not reversing Cenvat credit on the sale of plant & machinery. The tribunal found that the revenue failed to prove that the appellant had availed Cenvat credit, leading to the show cause notice being deemed unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.