Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisionist was a manufacturer of Compressed Natural Gas and Piped Natural Gas so as to be entitled to exemption from entry tax on capital goods and machinery brought into the local area for use in such manufacturing under the notification dated 18.02.2003.
Analysis: The notification issued under section 4-B of the Uttar Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 2000 exempted entry tax on capital goods, plant, machinery and spare parts brought into a local area for use in manufacturing. The term "manufacture" was not defined in the Act of 2000, and by section 2(2) its meaning had to be taken from section 2(e-1) and section 2(ee) of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948. Those provisions define manufacture in very wide terms, including producing, making, altering, processing, treating or adapting goods. Conversion of natural gas into CNG and PNG by compression was held to involve processing and making of a commercially distinct product, and the earlier determination under section 35 of the Act of 1948 also treated the revisionist as a manufacturer. The contrary view taken by the authorities, based on the absence of a new commercial identity, was held unsustainable.
Conclusion: The revisionist was held to be a manufacturer of CNG and PNG and was entitled to the exemption under the notification dated 18.02.2003, with refund of the entry tax paid.