TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal favors assessee on disallowance and interest charges under Sections 14A, 40(a)(ia)</h1> <h3>M/s. Finquest Securities Pvt. Ltd. Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax (2) (1) (2), Mumbai</h3> M/s. Finquest Securities Pvt. Ltd. Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax (2) (1) (2), Mumbai - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance under section 14A r.w.r. 8D2. Disallowance u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act3. Levy of interest under section 234C of the ActIssue 1: Disallowance under section 14A r.w.r. 8DThe appeal pertains to disallowance made under section 14A r.w.r. 8D. The assessee, a broker, voluntarily disallowed an amount under section 14A, which the Assessing Officer further disallowed under Rule 8D(2). The Commissioner (Appeals) restricted the disallowance to the amount already disallowed by the assessee. The AR contended that since no exempt income was earned, no disallowance should be made under section 14A. The Tribunal agreed, citing legal precedents, emphasizing that in the absence of exempt income, no disallowance can be imposed under section 14A. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the claim that no exempt income was earned during the relevant year.Issue 2: Disallowance u/s.40(a)(ia) of the ActThe Assessing Officer disallowed a payment made to a company under section 40(a)(ia) for not deducting tax at source. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the disallowance, considering the payment for professional and technical services. However, the Tribunal found that the payment was for accessing online information and data, not technical services, based on invoices and a letter from the company. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal ruled that the payment did not require TDS deduction, overturning the disallowance.Issue 3: Levy of interest under section 234C of the ActThe assessee challenged the interest levied under section 234C, arguing it should be based on the income returned, not determined by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal noted a significant disparity in the interest amount calculated by the assessee and the Assessing Officer. Agreeing with the assessee, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the interest calculation based on the returned income. The issue was allowed for statistical purposes.In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the disallowance under section 14A and u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act, and directing a review of the interest levy under section 234C. The judgment emphasized adherence to legal principles and precedents in determining disallowances and interest charges.
TaxTMI 