Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deletion of addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of disallowance of provision for damaged goods was justified.
Analysis: The Court followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case and noted that the relevant issue had already been answered in favour of the assessee. It applied the settled principle that a provision is recognised only where there is a present obligation arising from a past event, an outflow of resources is probable, and the amount can be reliably estimated. On that basis, the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was held to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The addition on account of provision for damaged goods was rightly deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.