2018 (8) TMI 1027 - AT - Customs

Tribunal upholds Revenue's appeal dismissal on DEPB duty payment validity under Customs Notification

C.C. Jamnagar Versus Reliance Industries

C.C. Jamnagar Versus Reliance Industries - TMI Issues:1. Benefit of exemption under Notification No. 89/2005-Cus dated 04/10/20052. Validity of DEPB scrip for duty payment during final assessmentAnalysis:1. The case involved the respondent importing Naphtha and LSFO against 8 bills of entry, provisionally assessed under Notification no. 43/2002-Cus and Notification no. 93/2004-Cus. Subsequently, the assessable value was higher, and the appellant claimed the benefit of Notification no. 89/2005-Cus under DEPB scheme for differential duty. A show cause notice was issued for recovery of duty and interest, culminating in an adjudication order denying the benefit. The Commissioner (A) allowed the appeal, leading to the Revenue's present appeal.2. The Revenue contended that the DEPB scrip was not produced during provisional assessment, thus the benefit could not be extended during final assessment. However, the respondent argued that the duty paid through DEPB scrips during final assessment was valid and legal, citing relevant provisions and judgments. The Tribunal found errors in the Revenue's appeal grounds, noting that the respondent made the duty payment through DEPB at the time of actual debit during final assessment, as per correct provisions. The Tribunal referenced a judgment stating that DEPB scheme can be treated as duty paid, whether by cash or debit of DEPB scrips. It emphasized that the timing of obtaining the DEPB license is irrelevant, as long as the DEPB scrip is produced for debit during duty payment. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.This detailed analysis covers the issues of exemption benefit under Notification No. 89/2005-Cus and the validity of DEPB scrip for duty payment during final assessment, providing a comprehensive understanding of the legal judgment.