Business Auxiliary Service on BSNL dealer incentives was rejected because tax had already been paid on the full card value.

Distribution and sale of BSNL SIM cards and recharge coupons, where dealers received incentives and discounts in the course of trading, was treated as outside taxable Business Auxiliary Service in view of earlier CESTAT rulings. The Tribunal noted that service tax had already been discharged by the telecom operator on the full value of SIM and recharge cards, so no further tax could be demanded from dealers or distributors selling those products to customers. It also rejected the Revenue's reliance on the dealer agreement with BSNL, holding that similar arrangements had already been considered in prior cases. The service tax demand was therefore held unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the distribution and sale of BSNL SIM cards and recharge coupons, with incentives and discounts received in the course of trading, constituted taxable Business Auxiliary Service and attracted a further service tax liability.

Analysis: The appellants were engaged in the sale of telecom products and received incentives and discounts from BSNL. The Tribunal found that the issue was covered by its earlier decisions holding that where telecom operators had discharged service tax on the full value of SIM cards and recharge cards, no further service tax could be demanded from dealers or distributors selling those products to the public. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue's reliance on the contractual arrangement with BSNL, holding that similar dealer arrangements had already been considered in earlier cases. It further held that incentives and discounts received in the course of trading activity did not attract service tax.

Conclusion: The demand of service tax on the appellants was not sustainable, and the appeals filed by the appellants were allowed while the Revenue's appeal was rejected.

---