Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee-company was a company whose business consisted wholly or mainly in the dealing in or holding of investments for the purposes of section 23A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 and section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The decisive test was whether the company's primary business was dealing in or holding investments. The company carried on substantial managing agency, cotton brokerage, ginning and pressing activities, and the shares held in the managed company and connected concerns were found to have been acquired and retained largely in aid of those business activities. The settled law applied required the expression "wholly or mainly" to be read as referring to the company's main or primary business, and the term "investment" in this context was to be understood in its popular, not technical, sense. On the facts found, the dividend-yielding shares did not convert the company into an investment company.
Conclusion: The assessee-company was not a company whose business consisted wholly or mainly in the dealing in or holding of investments.
Ratio Decidendi: A company falls within section 23A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 and section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 only if its primary business is dealing in or holding investments; substantial business activities carried on in addition to shareholdings, especially where the shares are held in aid of those activities, do not satisfy that test.