TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Advance Ruling Application Dismissed for Falling Outside Prescribed Statutory Scope Under CGST Act Section 97(2)</h1> <h3>In Re : Spentex Industries Ltd.</h3> SC rejected the applicant's Advance Ruling application under CGST Act 2017. The court found the submitted questions outside Section 97(2) scope, ... Levy of IGST - Supply of goods under Deemed Export - Mid-term Review - scope of Section 97(2) of the CGST Act 2017 - complete procedure for S.No.l & Explanation 1 of the Notification 48/2017-Central Tax dtd.18.10.2017 for supplies by DTA to Advance Authorisation Holder - applicability of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020 Mid Term Review and specify procedure for procuring goods from DTA against Advance Authorisation. Complete procedure for S.No.l & Explanation 1 of the Notification 48/2017-Central Tax dtd.18.10.2017 for supplies by DTA to Advance Authorisation Holder - Held that:- As per Section 97(2)(b) ruling can be sought on ‘Applicability of a notification under the provisions of this Act’, but the Applicant have not questioned applicability of a notification. On the contrary, the applicant admittedly agrees to the applicability of the notification. In the given circumstances, there is no reason to entertain this part of the instant Application. Applicability of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020 Mid Term Review and specify procedure for procuring goods from DTA against Advance Authorisation - Held that:- The question is beyond the ambit of Section 97(2), as it relates to applicability of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020 Mid Term Review and the related procedure. Obviously, the Applicant has sought a ruling for applicability of Foreign Trade Policy which is clearly beyond the ambit of Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under CGST Act 2017/MPGST Act 2017 - the application is not worthy of admission. Ruling:- The Application for Advance Ruling filed by the Applicant is rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017/MPGST Act 2017. Issues:1. Interpretation of provisions related to Advance Ruling under the CGST Act 2017.2. Applicability of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020 Mid Term Review on procurement of goods against Advance Authorisation.Analysis:Issue 1: Interpretation of provisions related to Advance Ruling under the CGST Act 2017:The applicant, engaged in the manufacture of Textile Yarn, sought clarification on the procedure for supplies by Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) to Advance Authorisation Holder and the applicability of a specific notification. The department opined that the questions raised did not fall under the purview of Section 97(2) of the CGST Act 2017. The Authority noted that the questions did not align with the categories listed under Section 97(2) for seeking Advance Ruling. The first question regarding the procedure for supplies by DTA did not challenge the applicability of the notification but sought clarification, which was not mandated by the Act. Therefore, the Authority concluded that Question 1 did not warrant consideration under the Advance Ruling provisions.Issue 2: Applicability of Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020 Mid Term Review on procurement of goods against Advance Authorisation:The second question raised by the applicant concerned the applicability of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020 Mid Term Review and the procedure for procuring goods from DTA against Advance Authorisation. The Authority determined that this question was also outside the scope of Section 97(2) as it pertained to the applicability of a trade policy, which was beyond the Authority's jurisdiction under the CGST Act 2017. Consequently, the application was deemed unworthy of admission due to being beyond the defined scope of Advance Ruling as per the Act.In conclusion, the application for Advance Ruling was rejected under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017/MPGST Act 2017, as the questions raised did not fall within the permissible categories for seeking Advance Ruling. The Authority emphasized that the questions regarding procedural clarifications and trade policy applicability were not within its mandate, leading to the dismissal of the application without delving into the merits of the case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
