Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was a co-operative bank hit by section 80P(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and therefore disentitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i), and whether the existence and role of nominal members required factual verification in the light of the principle of mutuality.
Analysis: The assessee claimed to be an employees' co-operative credit society dealing only with its members and without any banking licence or dealings with the public. The record did not establish that it was carrying on banking business merely because it accepted deposits and gave loans to members. The material on record also did not show provision of banking facilities to the general public or other features that would justify treating it as a co-operative bank. At the same time, the bye-laws and financial material indicated the existence of nominal members, and the applicability of the later Supreme Court ruling on breach of mutuality required verification of the rights, role and entitlements of such members from the assessee's records.
Conclusion: The assessee was not finally held to be a co-operative bank, but the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for limited verification regarding nominal members and the possible breach of mutuality before deciding the claim under section 80P on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: A co-operative credit society is not to be denied deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) merely because it accepts deposits and grants loans to its members, but where the record indicates the presence of nominal members and a possible loss of mutuality, the factual position must be verified before granting or denying the deduction.