Tribunal Upheld Penalties for Late Service Tax Payment

The Tribunal upheld penalties under Section 76 against the appellants for failing to pay service tax on time, despite financial difficulties. The appellants' argument of financial constraints and delayed client payments was not accepted, as they collected but did not deposit the tax. Precedents were cited to support the decision, emphasizing the obligation to promptly deposit collected taxes. The judgment, dated 31.07.2018, affirmed the penalties for non-compliance with service tax payment deadlines.

---

---

Issues involved:
Penalty under Section 76 for default in payment of service tax within stipulated time.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Default in payment of service tax
The appellants filed three appeals against orders imposing penalties under Section 76 for default in paying service tax within the stipulated time. The appellants were engaged in providing taxable service under 'manpower recruitment or supply agency service.' They failed to discharge the service tax liability for October 2008, amounting to Rs. 6,06,44,152. The Commissioner imposed penalties after the appellants continuously defaulted in paying service tax before the due date. The appellants argued that the delay was due to financial difficulties and delayed client payments.

Issue 2: Arguments of the parties
The appellant's counsel contended that the impugned order did not consider the facts properly. They highlighted financial difficulties and lack of intention to evade tax. The appellant requested dropping penalties under Section 76 invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The AR defended the order, stating the appellants collected but did not deposit the service tax, making them liable for penalties and interest. The AR cited precedents to support their argument.

Issue 3: Tribunal's analysis and decision
After considering submissions and precedents, the Tribunal found that the appellants collected service tax but did not deposit it in the Government Treasury. Despite financial difficulties, collecting tax from customers made the ground insufficient for penalty waiver. Precedents like Triton Communications Pvt. Ltd. and Rovion Tourists Promotions were cited to support the decision. The Tribunal upheld the penalties under Section 76, dismissing the appeals.

The judgment, delivered on 31.07.2018, upheld the penalties imposed on the appellants for defaulting in paying service tax within the stipulated time, emphasizing the obligation to deposit collected taxes promptly.

---