Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether seized gold jewellery could be released provisionally pending confiscation proceedings, and whether bank guarantee furnished by third parties could be accepted for that purpose.
Analysis: Section 67(6) of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act enables provisional release of seized articles on execution of a bond and furnishing of security in the manner and quantum prescribed, while Rule 140(1) of the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Rules provides for release on a bond for the value of the goods and a bank guarantee for the applicable tax, interest and penalty. The provisions do not require that the security must necessarily be furnished only by the person seeking release. Since the petitioner was unable to furnish the bank guarantee personally and third parties were willing to furnish the guarantee, there was no legal impediment to accepting such security.
Conclusion: The seized jewellery was directed to be released provisionally, and bank guarantees furnished by third parties were permitted to be accepted in place of a guarantee furnished by the petitioner.