TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court upholds decisions on Income Tax demand, sets aside order, dismisses demand, no costs awarded.</h1> <h3>Mr. A. Kumarappan Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, Tiruchirappalli And The Income Tax Officer, Ward- III (1), Tiruchirappalli</h3> Mr. A. Kumarappan Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, Tiruchirappalli And The Income Tax Officer, Ward- III (1), Tiruchirappalli - TMI Issues:Challenging the demand notice issued by the Income Tax Department regarding the Voluntary Retirement Scheme and exemption under Section 10(10C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Analysis:1. Exemption under Section 10(10C) of the Income Tax Act:The petitioner, an employee of ICICI Bank, received a consolidated payment under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme. The dispute arose regarding the conformity of the Scheme with Rule 2BA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The Income Tax Department contended that the Scheme did not comply with the Rules, thus denying employees the exemption under Section 10(10C) of the Act.2. Judicial Scrutiny and Precedents:The Voluntary Retirement Scheme was subject to judicial scrutiny in light of Rule 2BA. Various High Courts had different views on similar schemes. The Bombay High Court's judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Koodathil Kallyatan Ambujakshan established that the exemption under Section 10(10C) applied to employees benefiting from the Scheme. The Income Tax Department did not appeal this decision, leading to its finality. However, the Supreme Court in Chandra Ranganathan & Ors. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai set aside a Madras High Court order based on the circular issued by the Department.3. Finality of Decisions:Following the Bombay High Court's judgment, the Income Tax Department issued a circular granting exemption to retiring RBI employees. In a separate case, the Division Bench held that if the tax effect was below a certain limit, the Department need not file an appeal. The Supreme Court and Bombay High Court had unequivocally ruled that employees were eligible for exemption under Section 10(10C), rendering the Department's demand illegal.4. Court Decision and Conclusion:The High Court upheld the decisions of the Supreme Court and Division Bench, declaring the Income Tax Department's demand unsustainable in law. The writ petition was allowed, setting aside the impugned order. The Court followed the precedents and dismissed the demand. No costs were awarded, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
