Court rules expense for increasing authorized capital not deductible under Income Tax Act

The court held that the expense incurred by the assessee for increasing its authorized capital was deemed to be of capital nature and not allowable as a revenue expense under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal's decision was upheld based on precedents, establishing that expenditure for raising additional share capital is capital in nature. The court ruled against the assessee, directing them to pay the costs of the reference to the respondent.

---

---

Issues involved: Interpretation of revenue expense u/s 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 for increase of authorized capital.

Summary:
The judgment pertains to a reference u/s 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, regarding the allowability of an expense incurred by the assessee for increasing its authorized capital. The assessee increased its authorized capital from rupees twenty-five lakhs to rupees one crore, incurring registration fees of Rs. 5,625. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed the amount, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) allowed the claim. However, on further appeal, the Tribunal deemed the expenditure to be of capital nature, not for profit-making purposes.

The question referred to the court was whether the expense of Rs. 5,625 for increasing the authorized capital was allowable as a revenue expense. The Tribunal's conclusion was upheld based on precedents. Citing the case of Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., it was established that expenditure incurred for raising additional share capital is of capital nature. The Supreme Court in India Cements Ltd. v. CIT further clarified the distinction between obtaining capital through shares versus debentures, affirming that such expenditure is capital in nature.

Accordingly, the court answered the question in the negative, against the assessee, who was directed to pay the costs of the reference fixed at Rs. 300 to the respondent.

---