Service Tax on Multilevel Marketing Commission: Tribunal's Ruling & Amendment Impact The Tribunal ruled that commission received in a multilevel marketing scheme is subject to Service Tax under the Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Service Tax on Multilevel Marketing Commission: Tribunal's Ruling & Amendment Impact
The Tribunal ruled that commission received in a multilevel marketing scheme is subject to Service Tax under the Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) definition. While the Appellant's appeal was partially allowed, the Tribunal held that prior to an amendment on 15.04.2006, BAS only applied to "Commercial Concerns," excluding individuals like the Appellant. Therefore, the demand for Service Tax before the amendment date was set aside, with recalculations and penalties to apply from 15.04.2006 onwards.
Issues: Leviability of Service Tax on commission from multilevel marketing services under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) definition.
Analysis:
Issue 1: Leviability of Service Tax on commission from multilevel marketing services under BAS definition
The appeal was against the Order in Appeal confirming Service Tax on the commission received by the Appellant as a distributor in a multilevel marketing scheme. The Appellant argued that the definition of BAS was applicable only to a "commercial concern" until it was amended on 15.04.2006 to include "any person." The Appellant contended that during the period before the amendment, they would not be covered by the BAS definition as they were not a commercial concern. However, the Tribunal found that commission received in the multilevel marketing arrangement was chargeable to Service Tax under BAS, based on a previous case. The Tribunal noted that the commission received by the Appellant was a result of marketing and promotion efforts for the products, making them providers of Business Auxiliary Service. Despite deciding against the Appellant on the merit of the issue, the Tribunal acknowledged that prior to 15.04.2006, BAS only covered "Commercial Concerns," and as the Appellant was an individual, they would not be covered until the date of the amendment. Therefore, the demand for Service Tax before 15.04.2006 was set aside, and the adjudicating authority was directed to recalculate the demand from that date onwards and impose penalties accordingly.
In conclusion, the appeal was allowed partly, with the demand for Service Tax restricted to be applicable from 15.04.2006 onwards.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
