TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court orders rehearing of penalty assessment appeal under section 271(1)(c) of Income-tax Act, emphasizing legal principles</h1> <h3>Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Ram Prakash</h3> The High Court directed a rehearing of the appeal regarding the assessment of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the ... Penalty Issues involved: Assessment of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 based on alleged fraud or wilful or gross negligence in furnishing income particulars for the assessment year 1967-68.Summary:The assessee, owning a truck in partnership, filed a return disclosing income of Rs. 4,000, but the Income Tax Officer (ITO) added Rs. 13,000 as income from undisclosed sources due to unconvincing explanations regarding a truck purchase. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) found the explanation not entirely unreasonable and insufficient to prove fraud or negligence, emphasizing the need for deliberate defiance of law for penalty imposition.The Tribunal highlighted the non-retrospective nature of the amendment to section 271(1)(c) effective from April 1, 1968, removing the requirement to prove deliberate actions by the assessee. It noted the burden of proof reversal under the Explanation, placing the onus on the assessee to show no fraud or negligence in underreporting income, which was not adequately addressed in the Tribunal's judgment.Given the lack of detailed findings by the Tribunal and failure to discuss the IAC's concrete findings, the High Court directed a rehearing of the appeal for a proper decision in line with legal principles, citing precedents where rehearing was deemed necessary for justice. The Court returned the question unanswered, instructing the Tribunal to reconsider the case with due regard to the legal observations provided.In conclusion, the High Court emphasized the importance of thorough examination and proper application of legal provisions in assessing penalties for income tax violations, ensuring fairness and adherence to established legal standards.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
