We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Rectification of Mistake in Tribunal Order: Adding Services & Case Laws The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the rectification of a mistake apparent on the face of the order dated 17.08.2017. The rectification ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Rectification of Mistake in Tribunal Order: Adding Services & Case Laws
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the rectification of a mistake apparent on the face of the order dated 17.08.2017. The rectification involved adding specific services and case laws that were omitted in the typed copy of the order. The applicant's advocate successfully requested the necessary corrections, which were made without objection from the Revenue's representative. The rectification ensured the accuracy and completeness of the order, and it was approved by the Tribunal.
Issues: Rectification of mistake apparent on the face of the order
The judgment deals with an application seeking rectification of a mistake apparent on the face of the order dated 17.08.2017. The advocate for the applicant pointed out that certain services and case laws were mentioned in the order but were missing in the typed copy. Specifically, the services of 'Marine Insurance Charges, GTA for Export Service, and Effluent Treatment Service' were to be added after the word 'factory' in the order. Additionally, case laws related to these services were to be included. The advocate requested the rectification of the order to reflect these corrections. The Revenue's representative had no objection to the rectification. Consequently, the order was rectified as requested, with the necessary additions made to accurately reflect the intended content. The modification was allowed, and the rectification was made in accordance with the submissions.
In conclusion, the judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD involved the rectification of a mistake apparent on the face of the order dated 17.08.2017. The rectification was sought to include specific services and case laws that were inadvertently omitted in the typed copy of the order. Both parties were heard, and the rectification was made as requested by the applicant's advocate, with no objection from the Revenue's representative. The rectification was necessary to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the order, and it was duly allowed by the Tribunal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
