TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Grants Appeal for Deduction Claim under Sec 80P: Emphasizes Fairness in Tax Assessments</h1> <h3>M/s. Mararikulam Service Co-operative Bank Limited Versus The Income Tax Officer Ward – 2, Alappuzha</h3> M/s. Mararikulam Service Co-operative Bank Limited Versus The Income Tax Officer Ward – 2, Alappuzha - TMI Issues:- Assessment completed without filed returns of income- Denial of deduction u/s 80P(2) of the I. T. Act- Filing returns during pendency of appeals- Interpretation of relevant legal provisionsAnalysis:1. The appellant, a co-operative society, did not file returns of income for the assessment years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 as per section 139 of the I.T. Act. Consequently, the Assessing Officer completed assessments u/s 144 r.w. s. 147 estimating total income for both years.2. The appellant appealed to the CIT(A) questioning the validity of the notice u/s 148 and the denial of deduction u/s 80P(2) of the I.T. Act. The CIT(A) upheld the assessments and denied the deduction based on the non-filing of returns.3. Subsequently, the appellant filed returns during the pendency of appeals before the Tribunal, claiming deduction u/s 80P(2) based on a judgment. The Tribunal considered the legislative intent and legal precedents, including the judgment cited, which emphasized that belatedly filed returns can be accepted for consideration of deductions.4. The Tribunal referred to the High Court's ruling that returns filed beyond the stipulated period can be valid for deduction consideration if related proceedings are pending. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to expedite the consideration of the deduction claim u/s 80P of the I.T. Act, allowing the appeals for statistical purposes.5. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the stay applications were dismissed as they became irrelevant. The Tribunal's decision was based on the legal interpretation that returns filed during pending appeals can be considered for deductions, aligning with the legislative intent and judicial precedents.6. The Tribunal's detailed analysis and reliance on legal provisions and judgments ensured a fair consideration of the appellant's claim for deduction u/s 80P(2) of the I.T. Act, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles in tax assessments and appeals.
TaxTMI 