Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the assessee objecting to the stamp duty valuation during assessment and later filing a revision against the stamp valuation order, the matter was required to be referred to the Valuation Officer under section 50C(2) and the valuation issue reconsidered in light of the subsequent revision proceedings.
Analysis: The assessee had challenged the enhanced stamp valuation before the Assessing Officer during assessment proceedings, satisfying the first requirement under section 50C(2). The subsequent revision before the Tax Board was filed after the assessment order, so the Assessing Officer could not have acted on that later development at the time of assessment. However, once the appellate authority was informed of the revision, the valuation adopted by the stamp authority became subject to the outcome of those proceedings. In these circumstances, the proper course was to restore the matter so that the final stamp valuation result could be taken into account before computing capital gains.
Conclusion: The valuation issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration after taking into account the outcome of the revision proceedings, with reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee objects to stamp valuation before the Assessing Officer and the challenge to that valuation is pending in revision, the valuation for section 50C purposes must be determined with reference to the final result of the revision proceedings, and the matter may be restored for fresh consideration.