Clarificatory exemption notification restored captively used footwear parts benefit for the interregnum, defeating duty demand and penalty.

A later exemption notification for captively used footwear parts was treated as clarificatory because it restored a continuing exemption policy rather than introducing a new concession. The earlier omission created by Notification No. 89/87-CE was viewed as an unintended gap, so Notification No. 119/87-CE applied to the intervening period from 1 March 1987 to 23 April 1987. On that basis, the duty demand under Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and the connected penalty were held unsustainable and set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether Notification No. 119/87-CE dated 24.04.1987, granting exemption to parts of footwear used captively in the manufacture of footwear, was clarificatory and therefore applicable to the disputed period from 01.03.1987 to 23.04.1987, with the result that the duty demand and penalty were unsustainable.

Analysis: The exemption history showed a continuing policy of granting relief on footwear and parts thereof since 1967, and the omission of the relevant entry by Notification No. 89/87-CE was treated as an unintended gap rather than a withdrawal of the exemption policy. Notification No. 119/87-CE restored the same benefit for parts of footwear used in the factory of production, and in the light of the consistent legislative pattern and the Supreme Court authorities cited, it was held to be clarificatory in nature and not a new exemption introduced for the first time. The demand issued under Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, therefore could not survive for the disputed period.

Conclusion: The exemption applied to the disputed period. The demand of duty and the connected penalty were not sustainable and were set aside in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned orders were quashed because the later exemption notification was treated as clarificatory and effective for the disputed period.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a later exemption notification merely clarifies an already continuing policy and restores an omission created by an earlier notification, it operates retrospectively to preserve the exemption for the interregnum.

---