Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to refund of capital gains tax after the Tribunal had held the surplus on sale of shares to be capital accretions and the Income-tax Officer had revised the assessment accordingly.
Analysis: The Tribunal had conclusively found that the surplus realised from the sale of shares was not business profit but capital accretion. In consequence, the proper course was to assess the amount as capital gains, which was consistent with the assessee's own stand throughout the proceedings and with the provisional assessment already made under section 23B. The subsequent application by the Income-tax Officer under section 35 could not alter the effect of the Tribunal's finding, and the assessee could not seek refund of tax voluntarily paid on the basis of her own case.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to refund, and the appeals were liable to be dismissed.