Business Auxiliary Services tax does not apply to surplus earned on vessel space trading in a principal-to-principal arrangement.

Amounts collected from customers over and above freight paid to the shipping line were held not to form taxable value under Business Auxiliary Services, because the freight was treated as consideration for space or slots on a vessel. The arrangement between the shipping line and the logistics operator was characterised as principal-to-principal, not agency: the operator contracted for space, assumed contractual risk, and could earn a surplus on resale of that space. On that basis, the activity was not viewed as promoting or marketing a client's services, and the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the amount collected over and above the actual freight paid to the shipping line was liable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Services.

Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier view that freight in such transactions represents consideration for space or slots on a vessel and that the arrangement between the shipping line and the logistics operator is not one of agency but a principal-to-principal transaction. The operator contracts for space, assumes contractual risk, and may earn surplus from purchase and resale of space, which does not amount to promoting or marketing a client's services. On that reasoning, the amount collected from customers over and above the freight paid to the liner does not fall within the taxable value for Business Auxiliary Services.

Conclusion: The demand of service tax, interest, and penalties could not be sustained and was set aside in favour of the assessee.

---